Testosterone Pellets: What the Published Series and Labels Report

By Benn Bluestein-Veyra, M.Sc. Organic Chemistry · Updated 8 November 2026

ExaVeyra Sciences is a Miami-based B2B supplier of exosomes for topical aesthetic use to licensed clinics, and it refers licensed prescribers to a 503A compounding pharmacy that prepares formulations against individual prescriptions.

What this page covers, who can buy from ExaVeyra, and what is supplied
QuestionAnswer
What this page coversTestosterone pellets evidence: the Testopel label, published series, hematocrit findings, compounded pellets and Schedule III handling, as the sources state.
Who can orderLicensed clinics and practitioners whose active professional license and NPI ExaVeyra has verified. Exosome orders also require a signed professional-use acknowledgment.
What ships, and howCompounded formulations are prepared and dispensed by our 503A pharmacy partner against a patient-specific prescription from the licensed prescriber and ship from the pharmacy. The pharmacy dispenses any controlled substance under its own DEA registration.

The published evidence on testosterone pellets consists of one FDA-approved product label and a set of retrospective series, one open-label phase IV study and one small randomized trial. Testopel, approved in 1972 and relabeled most recently in July 2025, is the only prescription testosterone pellet Drugs@FDA lists as of 8 November 2026.[1][2] Its label warns of implant site infection and pellet extrusion and states that pellet implantation "is much less flexible for dosage adjustment" than injections.[1] The series report sustained testosterone concentrations for several months after implantation, extrusion and infection rates that varied with surgical technique, and hematocrit findings that ranged from a small mean rise in one cohort to erythrocytosis in about a third of men in others.[3][4][5][6]

This page reports what each label, study and regulation states, attributed to its source, for licensed practitioners who evaluate an implanted hormone service. Testosterone is a Schedule III controlled substance, so storage, dispensing records and the place of registration all apply to pellets kept or inserted in a practice.[7] The guideline thresholds for hematocrit and PSA are set out on the companion page on testosterone therapy guidelines and TRAVERSE, and the National Academies review of compounded hormones, including its pellet findings, has its own page in this cluster.

Drugs@FDA lists Testopel as the one approved testosterone pellet still marketed

Drugs@FDA records Testopel under ANDA 080911, an implantation pellet with a prescription marketing status, original approval on 13 July 1972 and a labeling supplement approved on 11 July 2025.[2] An openFDA query of Drugs@FDA on 8 November 2026 for pellets given by implantation returned Testopel and a discontinued desoxycorticosterone product, and no estradiol pellet.[2] A second testosterone pellet, Oreton, lost its approval on 23 September 2024 when FDA withdrew NDA 004652 because its holder had "repeatedly failed to file required annual reports".[8]

The label, revised 07/2025 and published on DailyMed by Endo USA, describes cylindrical sterile pellets of crystalline testosterone with stearic acid and polyvinylpyrrolidone as inactive ingredients, which "slowly release the hormone for a long acting androgenic effect" when implanted subcutaneously.[1] FDA's Testosterone Information page, current as of 23 June 2026, lists the approved formulations as "the topical gel, transdermal patch, buccal system (applied to upper gum or inner cheek), and injection" and does not mention pellets.[9]

The label states that androgens "are indicated for replacement therapy in conditions associated with a deficiency or absence of endogenous testosterone", naming primary hypogonadism and hypogonadotropic hypogonadism, and adds that "Safety and efficacy of TESTOPEL® (testosterone pellets) in men with “age-related hypogonadism” (also referred to as “late-onset hypogonadism”) have not been established."[1] Before initiation it directs the prescriber to "confirm the diagnosis of hypogonadism by ensuring that serum testosterone concentrations have been measured in the morning on at least two separate days and that these serum testosterone concentrations are below the normal range."[1]

FDA's page states that in June 2026 the agency requested updates to testosterone prescribing information that included "Removing the limitation of use stating the safety and efficacy of testosterone replacement therapy in men with age-related hypogonadism" and revising prostate safety information.[9] As of 8 November 2026, the published Testopel label does not yet reflect that request: it retains the limitation, carries no boxed warning, and still contains the older paragraph stating that "Long term clinical safety trials have not been conducted to assess the cardiovascular outcomes of testosterone replacement therapy in men."[1] Its warnings also include venous thromboembolism, a blood pressure warning stating that testosterone "can increase blood pressure which can increase cardiovascular (CV) risk over time", and a section on abuse and dependence.[1]

The label warns that implant site infection and extrusion were reported mostly within the first month

The warnings section reads: "Post-marketing cases associate TESTOPEL® pellet(s) insertion with implant site infection (cellulitis and abscess), and/or pellet extrusion at or near the implantation site."[1] The reported signs "included induration, inflammation, fibrosis, bleeding, bruising, wound drainage, pain, itching, and pellet extrusion", and the label states that "Although cases of infection and/or extrusion may occur at any time, most reported cases occurred within the first month after TESTOPEL® implantation."[1]

Two precautions are specific to the dosage form. The label states that pellet implantation "is much less flexible for dosage adjustment than is oral administration of or intramuscular injections of oil solutions or aqueous suspensions", and that "In the face of complications where the effects of testosterone should be discontinued, the pellets would have to be removed."[1] Its laboratory section states that "Hemoglobin and hematocrit should be checked periodically for polycythemia in patients who are receiving high doses of androgens."[1]

The label and the early series describe release that falls over the months after implantation

On absorption, the label states that "approximately one-third of the material is absorbed in the first month, one-fourth in the second month and one-sixth in the third month", and that the effect ordinarily continues for several months.[1] A six-institution retrospective analysis of 380 men undergoing 702 insertions reported that pellets raised total testosterone into the therapeutic range by one month and sustained concentrations above 300 ng/dL for four to six months; four extrusions and three hematomas were reported "early in our experience".[3]

A Baylor College of Medicine review of 273 men and 501 insertions analyzed serum total testosterone, free testosterone and estradiol against time from implantation.[10] Men with a body mass index of 25 or above reached lower testosterone peaks with slower decay, estradiol rose significantly only in men who received the larger pellet numbers, one man developed erythrocytosis, and the authors wrote that "Optimal dosing, frequency of reimplantation, and long-term safety of T pellets remain incompletely elucidated parameters."[10] A single-center, open-label phase IV study reported that mean testosterone rose and luteinizing hormone fell at weeks 1, 4 and 12, that both had returned to pre-implantation levels by week 24, and that PSA was unchanged over the study.[11]

Procedure series report extrusion and infection rates that varied with technique

A retrospective review of 168 men and 281 implantation procedures compared a single linear subcutaneous track with a modified technique using two angled tracks from one incision.[4] Extrusion occurred in 7.5 percent of standard-technique procedures and 0.8 percent of modified-technique procedures, infection in 5 percent and 1.2 percent, and pain prompting discontinuation in 7.5 percent and 1.7 percent; hematoma occurred only with the modified technique, in 1.2 percent.[4] None of the men with infection or bleeding required further surgery.[4]

The largest series is a review of practitioner-reported data on 1,204,012 testosterone and estradiol implant procedures in 376,254 patients from 2012 to 2019, 85 percent of them in women.[12] The author reported an overall complication rate below 1 percent, with extrusion the most common event, more frequent in men than in women; the paper discloses that the author founded the company whose tracking software collected the data.[12] In a survey of 113 men at an academic urology clinic, convenience was the most common reason for starting pellets, cost was the main reason for stopping, and 28.3 percent had discontinued.[13]

Hematocrit findings in pellet series range from a small mean rise to erythrocytosis in a third of men

A multi-institutional review of 97 men reported mean hematocrit of 43.9 percent before and 46.1 percent after implantation, an increase of 2.2 percentage points, and found that pretreatment hematocrit was inversely related to the change; the authors judged the increase "unlikely to translate into clinical relevance" for that cohort.[5] A single-institution review of 228 men, defining polycythemia as hematocrit above 50 percent, estimated rates of 10.4 percent at 6 months, 17.3 percent at 12 months and 30.2 percent at 24 months, and concluded that the incidence "may be higher than previously established".[6]

A three-year comparison of 178 men on a single formulation reported erythrocytosis, defined as hematocrit above 50 percent, in 66.7 percent of men on injections, 35.1 percent on pellets and 12.8 percent on gels, with no PSA increases in any group.[14] In women, a retrospective chart review of 220 pellet insertions performed between 2009 and 2022 in women with low libido reported no significant change in hematocrit or systolic blood pressure; its authors disclose consulting relationships and the ownership of a for-profit practice.[15] The monitoring thresholds that the Endocrine Society attaches to hematocrit during testosterone treatment are quoted on the guidelines and TRAVERSE page.

One randomized trial compared a compounded pellet with the approved product

A single-center, phase 3, randomized noninferiority trial assigned 75 men with testosterone deficiency to Testopel or to a compounded testosterone pellet and followed them at 2, 4 and 6 months with morning testosterone, estradiol, hematocrit and PSA.[16] Serum testosterone was similar between groups at each visit, 82 percent of men had fallen below 300 ng/dL by the end of the trial, and adverse events, including rises in PSA, estradiol and hematocrit, were similar; the authors listed the single-institution cohort and limited external validity as limitations.[16]

For compounded estradiol and testosterone pellets more broadly, the National Academies report recommended that FDA's Pharmacy Compounding Advisory Committee consider all compounded bioidentical hormone preparations in pellet form as candidates for the list of products that are demonstrably difficult to compound.[17] The reasoning behind that recommendation, the medical-record study of women on pellets that the report and later authors discuss, and the status of FDA's difficult-to-compound rulemaking are covered on the NASEM 2020 page of this cluster.

Section 503A requires an identified patient, which decides how office pellet stock is sourced

Section 503A exempts a compounded drug from the approval requirement only "if the drug product is compounded for an identified individual patient based on the receipt of a valid prescription order", and it bars a 503A pharmacy from compounding "regularly or in inordinate amounts" any drug products "that are essentially copies of a commercially available drug product".[18] A compounded testosterone pellet therefore reaches a patient through a prescription written for that patient, and the existence of an approved pellet brings the copies condition into play unless the prescriber documents a change that produces "a significant difference" for the patient.[18]

Section 503B describes an outsourcing facility that "is engaged in the compounding of sterile drugs", has registered as such, and "may or may not obtain prescriptions for identified individual patients".[19] A practice that wants pellets on hand before a patient is identified is therefore choosing between an approved product and an outsourcing facility; the comparison page on 503A and 503B office use, labels and CGMP sets out the two routes side by side.

Schedule III rules govern pellet storage, dispensing logs and each place of registration

Testosterone appears at 21 CFR 1308.13(f) as "(84) testosterone (17β-hydroxyandrost-4-en-3-one)", and the Testopel label states that the product "contains testosterone, a Schedule III controlled substance in the Controlled Substances Act."[1][7] For practitioners, 21 CFR 1301.75(b) requires that Schedule II through V substances "be stored in a securely locked, substantially constructed cabinet".[20] Under 21 CFR 1304.22(c), a registrant who dispenses must keep records of "the number of units or volume of such finished form dispensed, including the name and address of the person to whom it was dispensed, the date of dispensing, the number of units or volume dispensed, and the written or typewritten name or initials of the individual who dispensed or administered the substance".[21]

Registration is tied to a place. Under 21 CFR 1301.12(a), "A separate registration is required for each principal place of business or professional practice at one general physical location where controlled substances are manufactured, distributed, imported, exported, or dispensed by a person."[22] Read with the storage and record rules above, a practice that keeps pellets for insertion holds them in a locked cabinet at a registered location and logs each one dispensed or administered there.[20][21][22]

Compounded hormone preparations reach a practice working with ExaVeyra through a licensed 503A pharmacy partner on a patient-specific prescription, and the partner dispenses testosterone and any other controlled substance under its own DEA registration.[7][18] Whether a patient is a candidate for an implanted hormone, which product is prescribed, and how hematocrit, PSA and the implant site are monitored are decisions for the prescribing practitioner, documented against the label and guideline the practice follows.[1][10]

This article summarizes published clinical practice guidelines, trial reports and federal regulation for licensed practitioner education. It is not legal advice, medical advice, or regulatory guidance, and it does not establish that any particular product or practice is compliant. Confirm current federal and state obligations with qualified counsel.

Annotated References

Numbered in the order they are cited in the text. Each source is annotated with what it supports on this page; peer-reviewed articles are listed with journal, volume, issue and pages, and primary sources are regulations, agency documents, guidelines and position statements.

  1. 1.Official sourceDailyMed (NIH National Library of Medicine), TESTOPEL (testosterone pellets) prescribing information, Endo USA, revised 07/2025. Accessed 8 November 2026. https://dailymed.nlm.nih.gov/dailymed/drugInfo.cfm?setid=03b9c0b1-5884-11e4-8ed6-0800200c9a66
  2. 2.RegulatoryFDA, Drugs@FDA, ANDA 080911, TESTOPEL (testosterone) pellet for implantation: approval history. Accessed 8 November 2026. https://www.accessdata.fda.gov/scripts/cder/daf/index.cfm?event=overview.process&ApplNo=080911
  3. 3.Peer-reviewedMcCullough AR, Khera M, Goldstein I, Hellstrom WJ, Morgentaler A, Levine LA. A multi-institutional observational study of testosterone levels after testosterone pellet (Testopel) insertion. Journal of Sexual Medicine. 2012;9(2):594-601. https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/22240203/Annotation: Pooled data from six academic institutions on 380 men and 702 insertions: total testosterone above 300 ng/dL sustained for four to six months, and four extrusions and three hematomas early in the experience.
  4. 4.Peer-reviewedConners W, Flinn K, Morgentaler A. Outcomes with the "V" implantation technique vs. standard technique for testosterone pellet therapy. Journal of Sexual Medicine. 2011;8(12):3465-3470. https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/21883944/Annotation: Retrospective review of 168 men and 281 procedures: extrusion 7.5 percent versus 0.8 percent and infection 5 percent versus 1.2 percent with the standard and modified techniques.
  5. 5.Peer-reviewedHayden RP, Bennett NE, Tanrikut C. Hematocrit Response and Risk Factors for Significant Hematocrit Elevation with Implantable Testosterone Pellets. Journal of Urology. 2016;196(6):1715-1720. https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/27287525/Annotation: Multi-institutional review of 97 men: mean hematocrit 43.9 percent before and 46.1 percent after implantation, with pretreatment hematocrit inversely related to the change.
  6. 6.Peer-reviewedRotker KL, Alavian M, Nelson B, Baird GL, Miner MM, Sigman M, Hwang K. Association of subcutaneous testosterone pellet therapy with developing secondary polycythemia. Asian Journal of Andrology. 2018;20(2):195-199. https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/29205178/Annotation: Single-institution review of 228 men: estimated hematocrit above 50 percent in 10.4, 17.3 and 30.2 percent at 6, 12 and 24 months.
  7. 7.Regulatory21 CFR 1308.13, Schedule III (paragraph (f), anabolic steroids). Accessed 8 November 2026. https://www.ecfr.gov/current/title-21/chapter-II/part-1308/section-1308.13
  8. 8.RegulatoryFederal Register, 89 FR 77515 (23 September 2024), Progynon Associates, et al.; Withdrawal of Approval of Four New Drug Applications (docket FDA-2024-N-2219). Accessed 8 November 2026. https://www.federalregister.gov/documents/2024/09/23/2024-21680/progynon-associates-et-al-withdrawal-of-approval-of-four-new-drug-applications
  9. 9.RegulatoryFDA, Testosterone Information (Postmarket Drug Safety Information for Patients and Providers; content current as of 23 June 2026). Accessed 8 November 2026. https://www.fda.gov/drugs/postmarket-drug-safety-information-patients-and-providers/testosterone-information
  10. 10.Peer-reviewedPastuszak AW, Mittakanti H, Liu JS, Gomez L, Lipshultz LI, Khera M. Pharmacokinetic evaluation and dosing of subcutaneous testosterone pellets. Journal of Andrology. 2012;33(5):927-937. https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/22403285/Annotation: Retrospective pharmacokinetic review of 273 men and 501 insertions: the body mass index effect on peaks and decay, the estradiol rise with larger pellet numbers, one case of erythrocytosis, and the authors' statement that long-term safety remained incompletely elucidated.
  11. 11.Peer-reviewedKaminetsky JC, Moclair B, Hemani M, Sand M. A phase IV prospective evaluation of the safety and efficacy of extended release testosterone pellets for the treatment of male hypogonadism. Journal of Sexual Medicine. 2011;8(4):1186-1196. https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/21269402/Annotation: Single-center, open-label phase IV study: testosterone rose and LH fell at weeks 1, 4 and 12 and returned to pre-implantation levels by week 24, with PSA unchanged. Enrollment is not stated in the abstract.
  12. 12.Peer-reviewedDonovitz GS. Low complication rates of testosterone and estradiol implants for androgen and estrogen replacement therapy in over 1 million procedures. Therapeutic Advances in Endocrinology and Metabolism. 2021;12:20420188211015238. https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/34104398/Annotation: Practitioner-reported data on 1,204,012 implant procedures in 376,254 patients, 85 percent in women: complication rate below 1 percent with extrusion most common. The author founded the pellet company that collected the data.
  13. 13.Peer-reviewedSmith RP, Khanna A, Coward RM, Rajanahally S, Kovac JR, Gonzales MA, Lipshultz LI. Factors influencing patient decisions to initiate and discontinue subcutaneous testosterone pellets (Testopel) for treatment of hypogonadism. Journal of Sexual Medicine. 2013;10(9):2326-2333. https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/23859250/Annotation: Survey of 113 men at an academic urology clinic: convenience as the main reason to start pellets, cost as the main reason to stop, and 28.3 percent discontinuation.
  14. 14.Peer-reviewedPastuszak AW, Gomez LP, Scovell JM, Khera M, Lamb DJ, Lipshultz LI. Comparison of the Effects of Testosterone Gels, Injections, and Pellets on Serum Hormones, Erythrocytosis, Lipids, and Prostate-Specific Antigen. Sexual Medicine. 2015;3(3):165-173. https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/26468380/Annotation: Three-year retrospective comparison of 47 men on gels, 57 on injections and 74 on pellets: hematocrit above 50 percent in 12.8, 66.7 and 35.1 percent, and no PSA increases.
  15. 15.Peer-reviewedHernandez BS, Saffati G, Lowrey KA, Reddy A, Park BS, Song JJ, Lyon G, Khera M. Long-term testosterone pellet insertion in women with low libido shows no evidence of erythrocytosis and a minimal side effect profile. Translational Andrology and Urology. 2025;14(7):1842-1848. https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/40800100/Annotation: Retrospective chart review of 220 pellet insertions in women with low libido, 2009 to 2022: no significant change in hematocrit or systolic blood pressure. The number of women is not stated in the abstract; authors disclose industry and practice interests.
  16. 16.Peer-reviewedKresch E, Lima TFN, Molina M, Deebel NA, Reddy R, Patel M, Loloi J, Carto C, Nackeeran S, Gonzalez DC, Ory J, Ramasamy R. Efficacy and safety outcomes of a compounded testosterone pellet versus a branded testosterone pellet in men with testosterone deficiency: a single-center, open-label, randomized trial. Sexual Medicine. 2023;11(2):qfad007. https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/36936900/Annotation: Randomized noninferiority trial of 75 men comparing Testopel with a compounded pellet: similar testosterone at 2, 4 and 6 months, similar adverse events, and 82 percent below 300 ng/dL by the end.
  17. 17.Peer-reviewedNational Academies of Sciences, Engineering, and Medicine; Jackson LM, Parker RM, Mattison DR, editors. The Clinical Utility of Compounded Bioidentical Hormone Therapy: A Review of Safety, Effectiveness, and Use. National Academies Press (NCBI Bookshelf). 2020. https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/33048485/Annotation: The recommendation that all compounded hormone preparations in pellet form be considered for the demonstrably difficult to compound list; the full findings are reported on the NASEM 2020 page.
  18. 18.Regulatory21 U.S.C. 353a, Pharmacy compounding (United States Code, 2024 edition, GPO). Accessed 8 November 2026. https://www.govinfo.gov/content/pkg/USCODE-2024-title21/html/USCODE-2024-title21-chap9-subchapV-partA-sec353a.htm
  19. 19.Regulatory21 U.S.C. 353b, Outsourcing facilities (United States Code, 2024 edition, GPO). Accessed 8 November 2026. https://www.govinfo.gov/content/pkg/USCODE-2024-title21/html/USCODE-2024-title21-chap9-subchapV-partA-sec353b.htm
  20. 20.Regulatory21 CFR 1301.75, Physical security controls for practitioners. Accessed 8 November 2026. https://www.ecfr.gov/current/title-21/chapter-II/part-1301/section-1301.75
  21. 21.Regulatory21 CFR 1304.22, Records for manufacturers, distributors, dispensers, researchers, importers, exporters, registrants that are authorized to dispose of controlled substances, and collectors. Accessed 8 November 2026. https://www.ecfr.gov/current/title-21/chapter-II/part-1304/section-1304.22
  22. 22.Regulatory21 CFR 1301.12, Separate registrations for separate locations. Accessed 8 November 2026. https://www.ecfr.gov/current/title-21/chapter-II/part-1301/section-1301.12

Cite this page

ExaVeyra Sciences Editorial Team. Testosterone Pellets: What the Published Studies Report. ExaVeyra Sciences; 8 November 2026. Available from: https://exaveyra.com/science/hormones/testosterone-pellets-published-evidence. Accessed [date accessed].

Common questions

Is there an FDA-approved testosterone pellet?
Yes. Drugs@FDA lists Testopel under ANDA 080911, approved on 13 July 1972, with a labeling supplement approved on 11 July 2025, and it was the only prescription testosterone pellet listed on 8 November 2026. A second pellet, Oreton, lost its approval in September 2024 when FDA withdrew the application because its holder had not filed required annual reports. Drugs@FDA lists no approved estradiol pellet.
What does the Testopel label warn about the implant site?
The label reports postmarketing cases of implant site infection, including cellulitis and abscess, and pellet extrusion, with signs such as induration, inflammation, bleeding, wound drainage, pain and itching. It states that most reported cases occurred within the first month after implantation, that implantation is much less flexible for dosage adjustment than injections, and that pellets would have to be removed if the effects of testosterone had to be stopped.
What do the published pellet series report about hematocrit?
Findings vary by cohort. A review of 97 men reported a mean rise of 2.2 percentage points. A review of 228 men estimated hematocrit above 50 percent in 10.4 percent at 6 months and 30.2 percent at 24 months. A three-year comparison reported hematocrit above 50 percent in 35.1 percent of men on pellets, against 66.7 percent on injections and 12.8 percent on gels. A chart review of pellet insertions in women reported no significant hematocrit change.
How often did pellets extrude in the published series?
In one review of 281 procedures, extrusion occurred in 7.5 percent with a single-track technique and 0.8 percent with a two-track technique. A six-institution analysis of 702 insertions reported four extrusions early in its experience. A practitioner-reported dataset of more than 1.2 million procedures, collected by a pellet company founded by the author, reported extrusion as the most common complication, with an overall complication rate below 1 percent.
Has a compounded testosterone pellet been compared with Testopel?
One single-center randomized noninferiority trial assigned 75 men to Testopel or a compounded pellet and reported similar serum testosterone at 2, 4 and 6 months and similar adverse events, including rises in PSA, estradiol and hematocrit. The authors noted the single-institution cohort and limited external validity. The National Academies separately recommended that all compounded hormone pellets be considered for FDA's demonstrably difficult to compound list.
What DEA rules apply to testosterone pellets kept in a practice?
Testosterone is a Schedule III substance under 21 CFR 1308.13(f). Practitioners must store it in a securely locked, substantially constructed cabinet under 21 CFR 1301.75(b), keep dispensing records under 21 CFR 1304.22(c), and hold a separate registration for each principal place of practice where controlled substances are dispensed. Under 21 CFR 1301.12(a), that registration attaches to one general physical location.

This page is provided for informational purposes only. It is not medical advice, it is not intended to diagnose, treat, cure, or prevent any disease, and it is not a substitute for the judgment of a licensed practitioner. Consult a healthcare professional before acting on anything stated here. ExaVeyra Sciences is a supplier and takes no part in any diagnosis, treatment decision, or plan of care. These references report what endocrine guidelines, position statements, trials and FDA labeling state about hormone preparations, for professional education, and make no statement about the suitability of any product for any patient. Where this page discusses an FDA-approved product, the approved labeling governs and nothing here modifies it. Compounded medications are a separate product class: they are not FDA-approved finished drug products, they are prepared under section 503A of the Federal Food, Drug, and Cosmetic Act against a prescription for an individual patient, and they are prescription products supplied to licensed practitioners only. Where a controlled substance such as testosterone is prescribed, our 503A pharmacy partner dispenses it under its own DEA registration. The prescribing decision rests with the licensed practitioner. Read the full notice

Reference only. Not legal or medical advice.

The content of these guides is provided for general informational purposes only. It does not constitute legal, medical, or regulatory advice, and does not establish that any particular product or practice is compliant. Regulatory requirements vary by state and depend on the circumstances of each practice. Each practitioner should consult their own legal counsel and the applicable state licensing boards before acting on anything stated here.

Read the full notice